<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Beutelevision &#187; WiMAX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beutelevision.com/blog2/topics/wimax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beutelevision.com/blog2</link>
	<description>by Thomas Beutel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:24:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='beutelevision.com' port='80' path='/blog2/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Why Are Cables/Telcos Shaking In Their Boots Over WiMAX?</title>
		<link>http://beutelevision.com/blog2/2008/08/16/why-are-cablestelcos-shaking-in-their-boots-over-wimax/</link>
		<comments>http://beutelevision.com/blog2/2008/08/16/why-are-cablestelcos-shaking-in-their-boots-over-wimax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 20:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Beutel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiMAX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beutelevision.com/blog2/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw an interesting demonstration recently of WiMAX (specifically the mobile version, 802.16e) and needless to say, I am impressed. The demo should consistent data rates exceeding 10 megabits/sec in a moving vehicle. The kicker was that upstream speed was better than 2 megabits/sec.
Talk about disruption in the marketplace! This far exceeds 3G of course, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw an interesting demonstration recently of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wimax">WiMAX</a> (specifically the mobile version, 802.16e) and needless to say, I am impressed. The demo should consistent data rates exceeding 10 megabits/sec in a moving vehicle. The kicker was that upstream speed was better than 2 megabits/sec.</p>
<p>Talk about <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/03/microsoft_frien.html">disruption in the marketplace!</a> This far exceeds 3G of course, and for that matter, it exceeds most cable, DSL, and FIOS installations too. </p>
<p>In San Francisco, FIOS is not even an option&#8211;we really have only a choice of AT&#038;T or Comcast at speeds up to 4mbs. But I can imagine a day when somebody like Sprint puts a <a href="http://www.mcall.com/features/sns-wireless-0509webaccess,0,1379979.story">WiMAX installation on Mt. Sutro tower</a> and makes truly high-speed internet available for San Franciscans. All that would be required is a small receiver mounted on the house and pointed to the tower. Finally a competitive alternative to cable and DSL.</p>
<p>I can see why <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/03/25/comcast-time-warner-sprint-and-clearwire-could-join-forces-on/">Comcast is thinking of joining</a> rather than fighting WiMAX. Where will that leave AT&#038;T?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beutelevision.com/blog2/2008/08/16/why-are-cablestelcos-shaking-in-their-boots-over-wimax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
